Hi, I'm Dawn Klinge, welcome!  I write here because doing so helps me to take notice of the sweet things in life.




~You are welcome to pin images from this blog~


« 4.6.12 | Main | Treasures »

Radical Homemakers: a review

Thanks to Sarah and her strong recommendation, I've been reading a book that has provoked a great deal of thought and consideration the past few days.  I've been reading Radical Homemakers, Reclaiming Domesticity from a Consumer Culture.  I can't say enough good things about this book.  I don't agree with everything the author says, but it has sparked a fire in me, both encouraging me in the the efforts I'm already making and motivating me to be more mindful of what else I can do to live a life that shows,

  1.  Respect and care for the community of life

  2.  Ecological integrity

  3.  Social and economic justice

  4.  Democracy, non-violence, and peace

This is not a book that says that every woman must be a homemaker.  Whether working inside the home or outside, it offers the four guidelines above as a "governing force for a life-serving economy".  It is a book that asserts the value and necessity of those (men or women) who do follow this path. The book is primarily about the necessity of more people doing what it takes to create households that are not so dependent on an unsustainable consumer economy, households that produce something rather than merely consume.  And the reality is, that for society to live in a more sustainable way, there is a need for those who can do more for their households- such as making home cooked meals from local foods and reclaiming other lost skills that allow independence from a consumer economy.

At the beginning of the book, I often found myself agreeing with the author but also bristling at my perception of an idea, that for me to be a "radical homemaker", I needed to move to the country, grow my own food (and preserve it), raise chickens,etc...   I find that kind of life quite beautiful and admirable, but it's not for me....and it's most certainly not for my husband.  We dream of moving out of the suburbs and into a more urban living situation, not to the country.  But as I read more, I became more excited about how our dream could actually fit very well within those four tenets of sustainable living.  Moving to a more urban setting would allow us to use our car much less (if at all).  We would also be living in smaller quarters, requiring us to be more mindful about consumption.  If I wanted to garden, I could get a plot in a community garden.  Locally owned business (vs. chains) are in abundance in the city and so are farmer's markets.  The opportunities for community involvement in the city are so exciting to me.  There are perks to both country and city living, but done mindfully, I think that both offer ample opportunity to live according to those four tenets.  I'm sure that with some creativity and the desire, so does suburban living.  I'll do my best while I'm here.   But for me, it's not something I want long term.  The amount of time that I currently spend in my car as a suburban mom is not sustainable, not for the planet or for my personal satisfaction.

It might take a few years.  My daughter starts high school in a little more than a year.  We told her she could go to public high school- and a promise is a promise.  Unfortunately, the lack of good public high schools downtown will probably keep us in the suburbs until either she changes her mind, she graduates, or we're able to afford a private high school.   We'll see what happens.


EmailEmail Article to Friend

Reader Comments (4)

How wonderful :-) I love how you have explained the ways in which an urban lifestyle can be sustainable for the community and planet. You actually have me thinking how much I'd love to live in the city! I would do it for sure except for my little dog :-)

My prayer for you would be that you found a good city high school for your daughter. Surely there must be one?? Even if she has to travel a while on the bus to get more uptown? Or maybe if you visited schools, it would prove that although the facade is awful the energy is really good or there are some innovative teachers? I hope so much you can find a compromise so your whole family can get its needs met sooner rather than later.

April 4, 2012 | Unregistered Commentersarah

I'm happy to hear that you liked the book, even without wanting the country lifestyle. I would love that, but it just isn't practical for our life, especially with shared custody, etc. It's interesting to share ideas for how you live the radical homemaker life wherever you happen to be. I hope you'll join the bookclub and share some of your ideas with us! https://www.facebook.com/groups/354890164539633

April 4, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterJoy

There are going to be plusses and minuses everywhere. The core of this is the attitude toward life. My idea of life-sustaining has a whole lot more to do with the raising, loving, pruning, disciplining, playing with and teaching of children. Without that all the rest of it is just a nice hipster attitude toward the planet. The serious cultivation of a family is the essential thing - if we cook, we sit together at the table and talk. If there are chores, we do them together. We reclaim things from goodwill and be creative with them, we create together and as we do all this, our children become the thinking, hard working, responsible, life loving, potential recognizing, curious, loving responsible people who are the true endangered species on this planet.

that's what I think.

April 7, 2012 | Unregistered CommenterK

Kristen- Absolutely. I agree. The raising of children is of most importance. The book actually stressed the top importance of relationships and family quite a lot, though I didn't do the greatest just of conveying that.

April 7, 2012 | Registered CommenterDawn

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>